Pantak sebagai Jembatan Spiritual dalam Sistem Religi Dayak Kanayatn
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.35312/forum.v55i1.856Kata Kunci:
Pantak, Spiritual bridge, Dayak Kanayatn, Religious system, Ancestral spiritsAbstrak
This article aims to explain the existence of Pantak in the religious system of the Dayak Kanayatn people as a spiritual bridge connecting humans with ancestral spirits. The focus of the study is to discuss the background of beliefs in Pantak, the process and types of its manufacture, the forms of rituals that accompany it, and the challenges of the sustainability of the Pantak tradition in the contemporary era. This research uses an exploratory study method with an interpretative approach, which integrates descriptive-ethnographic data and the author's cultural experience as part of the Dayak Kanayatn community. The results of the study show that Pantak was born from the belief in the continuity of the relationship between humans and ancestors after death, as well as the belief in Jubata as the source of life. This research confirms that Pantak is not just a cultural artifact, but a living religious symbol that is continuously negotiated amidst the dynamics and changes in religiosity, modern rationality, and social and cultural transformations of the Dayak Kanayatn people.
Referensi
Ananya, Swaraj. “Exploratory Research: Purpose And Process.” Parisheelan 15, no. 2 (2019): 666–70.
Andrianus, and Triyanto Sri Iswidayati. “Patung Pantak Dayak Kanayatn: Kajian Bentuk Dan Fungsi Dalam Perubahan Sosial Budaya.” Catharsis: Journal of Arts Education 5, no. 2 (2016): 135–41.
Cindy, Dahniar Th. Musa, and Efriani. “Patung Pantak Panyugu: Manifestasi Sistem Nilai Dan Budaya Kognitif Pada Kepercayaan Suku Dayak Kanayatn.” Sosial Budaya 20, no. 2 (2023): 178–89.
Gitosaroso, Muh., Shobirin, and Abdul Basit. “A Portrait of the Religiosity in the Multicultural Society: A Case Study in Pontianak City, West Kalimantan, Indonesia.” Journal of Research in Humanities and Social Science 9, no. 1 (2021): 47–55.
Hartatik. “Adat Dan Perubahan Budaya Pada Masyarakat Dayak Kanayatn.” Jurnal Naditira Widya (Balai Arkeologi Banjarmasin) 16 (2006): 93.
Hendro, Herpianto. “Pantak Suku Dayak Kanayatn Dalam Karya Seni Kriya Logam.” Institut Seni Indonesia Yogyakarta, 2010. http://lib.isi.ac.id/.
Koentjaraningrat. Pengantar Ilmu Antropologi. Jakarta: Rineka Cipta, 2009.
Langhe, Rogier De, and Eric Schliesser. “Evaluating Philosophy as Exploratory Research.” Metaphilosophy 48, no. 3 (2017): 227–44. https://doi.org/10.1111/meta.12244.
Lubis, Ali Akhbar Abaib Mas Rabbani, and Natasha Gloria Runtu. Generasi Muda Dayak Kanayatn. Sleman: Bintang Pustaka Madani, 2020.
Miller, Linda Mayorga, Terry Lynn Gall, and Lise Corbeil. “Journal of Spirituality in Mental Health The Experience of Prayer With a Sacred Object Within the Context of Significant Life Stress.” Journal of Spirituality in Mental Health 13, no. 4 (2011): 247–71. https://doi.org/10.1080/19349637.2011.616101.
Moir, Mark James. “The Noetic–Contextual Leadership Model with Spiritual Bridge Layer A Field Theory of Consciousness, Meaning, and Adaptive Coherence.” SSRN, 2025, 1–5. https://doi.org/https://dx.doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.5692455.
Norat, Gisela. “Latina Grandmothers: Spiritual Bridges to Ancestral Lands.” Journal Ofthe Association for Research on Mothering 7, no. 2 (2005): 98–111.
Oktaviani, Ursula Dwi, and Evi Fitrianingrum. “Analisis Semiotika Roland Barthes Pada Palantar Nyangahatn Manta’ Upacara Nabo’ Pantak Suku Dayak Kanayatn.” Belajar Bahasa: Jurnal Ilmiah Program Studi Pendidikan Bahasa Dan Sastra Indonesia 4, no. 2 (2019): 207–14.
Pasalima, Petrus, and Antonius Denny Firmanto. “Perkembangan Teologi Dan Makna Pantak Dalam Adat Istiadat Masyarakat Dayak Kanayatn.” The Messengers: Jurnal Teologi Dan Pendidikan Kristen 1, no. 2 (2020): 161–75.
Piter, Romanus. “Makna Kearifan Lokal Tradisi Bauma Batahutn Suku Dayak Kanayatn Di Kalimantan Barat.” Balale’ : Jurnal Antropologi 4, no. 1 (2023): 1–23. https://doi.org/10.26418/balale.v4i1.63117.
———. “The Metaphysical Concept Of The Dayak Kanayatn People In Terms Of Sabaya Diri’ Based On The Philosophy Of Gabriel Marcel.” Jurnal Fides et Ratio 10, no. 2 (2025): 65–71.
Piter, Romanus, Julio Purba Kencana, and Fransesco Agnes Ranubaya. “The Motives of Dayak Kanayatn Students from Migrant Lands in Malang City Still Maintain the Malapas Tradition.” International Journal of Ethnic, Racial, and Cultural Heritage 3, no. 1 (2025): 1–14.
Praptantya, Donatianus BSE, and Naniek Kasniyah. “Fungsi Dan Makna Pantak Bagi Masyarakat Dayak Kanayatn.” Sosiohumanika 16, no. 1 (2003): 83.
Prawana, Bambang H. Suta. Identitas Dan Aktualisasi Budaya Dayak Kanayatn Di Kabupaten Landak Kalimantan Barat: Kajian Tentang Folklor Sub Suku Dayak Kanayatn. Jakarta: Direktorat Jendral Nilai Budaya, Seni dan Film Departemen Kebudayaan dan Pariwisata, 2007.
Reiter, Bernd. “Theory and Methodology of Exploratory Social Science Research.” IJSRM: International Journal of Science and Research Methodology 5, no. 4 (2017): 129–50. www.ijsrm.humanjournals.com.
S., Herculanus Bahari. “Makna Pantak Dalam Binua Dayak Kanayatn.” In Mencermati Dayak Kanayatn, edited by Nico Andasputra and Vincentius Julipin. Pontianak: Institute of Dayakology Research and Development, 1997.
Sari, Margaretha Mandiri, Yunus Selan, and Sri Dwi Harti. “Kajian Terhadap Patung Pantulak Sebagai Perantara Komunikasi Dengan Arwah Leluhur.” Jurnal Luxunos 7, no. 1 (2021): 48–63.
Syam, Christanto, Yudhistira Oscar Olendo, Jagad Aditya Dewantara, and Eka Fajar Rahmani. “Oral Literature and Social Identity of the Dayak Kanayatn: The Extinction of Oral Literature in the Midst of Contemporary Cultural Trends.” Cogent Arts and Humanities 11, no. 1 (2024). https://doi.org/10.1080/23311983.2024.2376785.
.png)
