Pancasila sebagai Agama Sipil? Analisis Kritis dalam Kerangka Teologi Publik Kristen di Indonesia
Abstract
In recent years, there has been a growing movement in Indonesia seeking to reject Pancasila as the state ideology. However, this effort has not gained significant public support. Rejecting Pancasila is equivalent to rejecting Indonesia’s foundational commitment to diversity, a value that has sustained national unity. Although Pancasila is not a religion, its principles are deeply consistent with core teachings found across various religious traditions, making it a unique ideological basis for the Indonesian nation. This study aims to explore whether Pancasila can be understood and accepted as a form of civil religion within Indonesian society. It also seeks to contribute to the development of public theological discourse, particularly from a Christian Protestant perspective, in response to current misunderstandings about Pancasila as civil religion among Christian communities. Employing a qualitative method through a literature study, the analysis draws from theological, philosophical, and socio-political sources. The study concludes that Pancasila, viewed through the lens of public theology, can indeed serve as a civil religion that strengthens national identity without contradicting religious beliefs.
References
Bellah, Robert. “Civil Religion in American.” Daedalus 96, no. 1 (1967): 5.
Doak, Mary. Reclaiming Narrative for Public Theology. New York: State University of New York Press, 2004.
Effendy, Bahtiar & Hendro Prasetyo. Radikalisme Agama. Jakarta: Pusat Pengkajian Islam dan Masyarakat, 1998.
Haryanto, Sindung. Sosiologi Agama : Dari Klasik Hingga Postmodern. Yogyakarta: Ar-Ruzz Media, 2015.
Parmudi, Mochamad. “Civil Religion di Indonesia.” Jurnal Sosiologi Wali Songo 2, no. 1 (2018): 52.
PGI. Dokumen Keesaan Gereja: Persekutuan Gereja-gereja di Indonesia (DKG-PGI) 2009-2014. Jakarta: PGI, 2010.
Rachman, Budhy M. Membela Kebebasan Beragama. Jakarta: Democracy Project, 2011.
Raharjo, M. Dawam. “Demokrasi, Agama, dan Masyarakat Madani.” Unisia 39, no. XXII/III (1999): 27.
Sahidah, Ahmad. Agama Sipil. Yogyakarta: Cantrik, 2019.
Setiawan, David E. & Firman Panjaitan. “Titik Temu Pancasila dan Etika Politik Gereja dalam Melawan Radikalisme di Indonesia.” Jurnal SMaRT Studi Masyarakat, Religi dan Tradisi 7, no. 1 (Juni 2021): 47.
Sumartana, Th. “Fundamentalisme Protestan : Amerikanisme yang Banal.” Dalam dalam Radikalisme Agama, Bahtiar Effendy & Hendro Prasetyo (Penyunting). Jakarta Pusat: Pusat Pengkajian Islam dan Masyarakat, 1998.
Suseno, Franz M. Mencari Makna Kebangsaan. Yogyakarta: Kanisius, 1998.
Titaley, John. “Perubahan Makna Kebangsaan Indonesia Setelah Menjadi Persatuan Indonesia Dalam Pancasila dan Dampaknya bagi Kehidupan Berbangsa Indonesia”.” Studia Philosophica et Theologica 22, no. 2 (2022): 234 & 238.
Wardah, Fathiyah. “‘Setara Institute: Jumlah Pelajar yang Intoleran Aktif Meningkat, 83% Nilai Pancasila Bisa Diganti.’” VOA Indonesia, 7 Januari 2024. https://www.voaindonesia.com/a/setara-institute-jumlah-pelajar-yang-intoleran-aktif-meningkat-56-setuju-syariat-islam/7097499.html.
Wibisono, M. Yusuf. Sosiologi Agama. Bandung: UIN Sunan Gunung Djati, 2020.
Yewangoe, Andreas A. “Umat Kristen Indonesia dan Pancasila.” Dalam dalam Pankratius Balun, dkk (ed), Sigma Pancasila, 56–57. Jakarta: Badan Pembinaan Ideologi Pancasila, 2020.