The Catholic Church’s Resistance to Geothermal Projects in Flores: Rethinking the Role of Religious Institutions in Environmental Justice
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.35312/studia.v25i2.798Keywords:
Catholic Church, geothermal resistance, Flores Indonesia, ecotheology, environmental justiceAbstract
This study examines the Catholic Church's resistance to a geothermal energy development project in Flores, Indonesia, by highlighting the theological, ecological, and social perspectives that underlie it. This resistance is motivated by concerns about potential environmental damage, health impacts, and threats to the socio-economic well-being of local communities. For the Catholic Church, preserving God's creation is not only a spiritual mandate but also a moral responsibility related to a commitment to sustainable development. This study uses a qualitative approach with a descriptive case study method.Data were collected through interviews and supported by secondary sources such as media reports and relevant academic literature. Through thematic analysis, this study examines various forms of advocacy carried out by the Church, including the use of moral discourse, grassroots mobilization, and collaboration with indigenous communities and environmental organizations. This study also examines how the Church plays a role as a religious institution and social agent in challenging the narrative of state and corporate development that ignores ecological sustainability and community rights. The findings show that the Catholic Church in Flores plays a significant role in shaping public opinion, encouraging community resistance, and influencing policy debates related to geothermal energy.This study contributes to a broader understanding of ecotheology and the role of religion in environmental justice movements. The Church’s resistance reflects a contextual theological response that connects spirituality with social-ecological activism and offers a model for just, sustainable, and inclusive development.
References
BooksBeckford, J. A., & Demerath III, N. J. (2007). The SAGE Handbook of the Sociology of Religion. SAGE Publications.Gill, A. (1998). Rendering unto Caesar: The Catholic Church and the State in Latin America. University of Chicago Press.Guha, R., & Martinez-Alier, J. (1997). Varieties of Environmentalism: Essays North and South. Earthscan.Johnston, L. F. (2013). Religion and sustainability: Social movements and the politics of the environment.Equinox Publishing.Martinez-Alier, J. (2002). The Environmentalism of the Poor: A Study of Ecological Conflicts and Valuation. Edward Elgar Publishing.Smith, C. (1996). Disruptive Religion: The Force of Faith in Social Movements Activism. Routledge.Taylor, B. (2010). Dark green religion: Nature spirituality and the planetary future.University of California Press.Van Cott, D. L. (1994). Indigenous Peoples and Democracy in Latin America. Inter-American Dialogue.Van Cott, D. L. (2000). The Friendly Liquidation of the Past. University of Pittsburgh Press.Yashar, D. (2005). Contesting Citizenship in Latin America: The Rise of Indigenous Movements and the Postliberal Challenge. Cambridge University Press. Pope Francis. (2015). Laudato Si’: On care for our common home.Libreria Editrice Vaticana.Journal Articles and Scientific ReportsAlbab, W. U. (2023). Kajian terhadap pembangunan geotermal di Pulau Flores berdasarkan perspektif teori keadilan (John Rawls). Deposisi: Jurnal Publikasi Ilmu Hukum, 1(4), 286-302. https://doi.org/10.59581/deposisi.v1i4.1760
Arif, M., Sabarudin, S., Kurjum, M., & Abdullah, R. b. (2023). Religious harmony in East Nusa Tenggara: Insights into local tradition and values of Muslim communities. Analisa: Journal of Social Science and Religion, 8(2). https://doi.org/10.18784/analisa.v8i2.2098Astro, R. B. (2023). Overview of the potential and utilization of geothermal energy on Flores Island. Jurnal Penelitian Pendidikan IPA (JPPIPA), 9(12), 1377–1384. https://doi.org/10.29303/jppipa.v9i12.5616Aziziah, S. P. N., et al. (2023). Exploring geothermal energy developmentin Indonesia: Policy failures and impacts on women’s rights. Recourse and Solidaritas Perempuan. https://www.re-course.orgBaskin, J. (2015). Paradigm dressed as epoch: The ideology of the Anthropocene. Environmental Values, 24(1), 9–29. https://doi.org/10.3197/096327115X14183182353746Erb, M. (2003). Faithful Catholics: Religion and identity in western Flores. Historie et Anthropologie Asies, 2, 125–160.Huang, Z., et al. (2016). Environmental risk assessment of manganese and its associated heavy metals in a stream impacted by manganese mining in South China. Human and Ecological Risk Assessment: An International Journal, 22(6), 1341–1358. https://doi.org/10.1080/10807039.2016.1169915Jemadin, S. (2024). The dilemma of geothermal development in Flores Manggarai: Blessing or curse? JISORA (Jurnal Ilmu Sosial, Politik dan Humaniora), 7(2).Kriswibowo, A., Amtiran, A., & Laudato Si. (2024). Environmental theology and the leadership of Pope Francis. East Asian Journal of Multidisciplinary Research (EAMR), 3(2), 617–628.Renoth, R., et al. (2023). Social acceptance ofgeothermal technology on a global view: A systematic review. Energy, Sustainability and Society, 13(49). https://doi.org/10.1186/s13705-023-00432-1Tucker, M. E. (2001). Religion and ecology: Can the climate change? Daedalus, 130(4), 239–260.Versluis, A. (2011). Review of Dark Green Religion: Nature Spirituality and the Planetary Futureby Bron Taylor. Journal for the Study of Radicalism, 5(1), 137–139. https://doi.org/10.14321/jstudradi.5.1.0137Williams, M., Todd, D., & Roney, N. (2012). Toxicological profile for manganese. Agency for Toxic Substances and Disease Registry (US).World Health Organization. (2015). Manganese and its compounds: Environmental aspects. WHO.Website / Laporan Media OnlineAMAN. (2025, January 15). Uskup Agung Ende tolak proyek geothermal, AMAN: Sikap ini patut diikuti keuskupan lain. Diakses 22 Juni 2025, dari https://aman.or.id/news/read/1996Floresa. (2025, June 21). Gubernur NTT bentuk tim investigasi geothermal di Flores. Diakses 21 Juni 2025, dari https://floresa.co/2025/06/21/gubernur-ntt-bentuk-tim-investigasi-geothermal
Mongabay Indonesia. (2023, March 8). Was-was panas bumi rusak ruang hidup warga Poco Leok. Diakses dari https://mongabay.co.id/2023/03/08/was-was-panas-bumi-rusak-ruang-hidup-warga-poco-leok/Mongabay Indonesia. (2023, March 23). Warga Tolak Proyek Geothermal Poco Leok. Diakses dari https://mongabay.co.id/2023/03/23/warga-tolak-proyek-geothermal-poco-leok-ini-alasannya/Mongabay Indonesia. (2025, April 6). Enam Uskup Ende Tolak Proyek Geothermal. Diakses dari https://mongabay.co.id/2025/04/06/enam-uskup-ende-tolak-proyek-geothermal-begini-perkembangannya/KSI Indonesia. (2015, November 9). Pengetahuan lokal untuk mengembalikan tiga penanda musim. Diakses dari https://www.ksi-indonesia.org/old/in/news/detail/pengetahuan-lokal-untuk-mengembalikan-tiga-penanda-musimInformantsNgozo, interviewed in person on June 19, 2025.Antonius, interviewed in person on June 21, 2025.
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2025 Nita Amriani, Andi Alfian

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.















