The Dayak Tribe's Bonum Commune Crisis: Traditional Farming Versus Modern Economic Activities
Abstract
This research highlights the local wisdom of the Dayak people of Kalimantan in clearing agricultural land. The tradition of farming for hundreds of years has built bonum commune and become an index of happiness for the Dayak community. However, local wisdom has been marginalized by a very progressive national development program, thanks to the support of technological advances and market needs. This research confronts the traditional way of Dayak communities with the modern plantation industry in managing forests. The two ways are evaluated ethically-morally, using literature studies in the perspective of ecological ethics. The research found that the Dayak custom of farming, which is full of socio-religious values, is carried out by burning a limited and measurable area of forest. After harvesting, the field area is reforested. In contrast, extensive and aggressive deforestation, without the prospect of reforestation, is carried out by oil palm plantation companies, both government and private. The current development program prioritizes oil palm plantations, and prohibits the Dayak tradition of farming. This is destroying the sociocultural life of the Dayak people that has been lived for hundreds of years. This research proposes that in carrying out macroeconomic activities in Kalimantan, government or private companies still accommodate local wisdom, and carry out locality-based development strategies. Meanwhile, Dayak communities need to adapt by carrying out microeconomic activities in accordance with applicable laws using ecological technology, while maintaining their socio-religious values.
References
Armada Riyanto, F.X.“Percikan Revolusi Industri 4.0 Refleksi Filosofis Tentang Siapa Manusia Dan Allah.” Siapakah Manusia; Siapakah Allah, ed. Valentinus, A. Denny Firmanto, dan B.A. Pareira, 1-25. Malang: STFT WS Publication, 2019.
Ernesto, Gabrielle, Agung Hartono, dan Dian Ahmad, “Eksplorasi Etnomatematika Dalam Tradisi Beruduk Suku Dayak Desa Kabupaten Sintang.” Khatulistiwa: Jurnal Pendidikan Dan Pembelajaran, Vol. 11, no. 6, (Juni 2022): 17–28. DOI: 10.26418/jppk.v11i6.54858.
Fransiskus. Ensiklik Laudato Si’, ed. Martin Harun. Jakarta: Obor, 2015.
Gunawan, Restu. “Politik Identitas Keindonesiaan.” Kompas, 29 Oktober 2022.
I Wayan Marianta, Yohanes. “Akar Krisis Lingkungan Hidup.” Studia Philosophica et Theologica, Vol. 11, no. 2 (Oktober 2011): 231-253. https://doi.org/ 10.35312/spet.v11i2.72.
Katarina dan Ruat Diana. “Isu Teologi Sosial Dalam Semboyan Dayak dan Penanganan Kasus Peladang di Kabapaten Sintang, Kalimantan Barat.” The Messengers: Jurnal Teologi dan Pendidikan Kristen, Vol. 1, No. 1 (2020): 39-54.
Kunjan, Blasius, dan F.X. Pinson. Sejarah, Adat-Istiadat Dan Hukum Adat Dayak Ketungau Sesaek. Pontianak: PPSDAK Pancur Kasih, 2005.
Kusniawati, Dhianada Salsabila Lugo, dan Ida Susilowati. “Dampak Sosial Dan Keamanan Masyarakat Hiroshima Dan Nagasaki Pasca Dijatuhkannya Bom Atom Tahun 1945.” Journal of Legal Research, Vol. 3, No. 4 (2021): 607–626. http://dx.doi.org/10.15408/jlr.v3i4.22770.
Lontaan, J.U. Sejarah Hukum Adat Dan Adat Istiadat Kalimantan Barat, ed. ke-1. Kalimantan Barat: Pemda Tingkat I Kalbar, 1975.
Low Choo Chin, “Hitlerism, Anti-Semitisme Dan Interpretasi Holocaust.” Sejarah: Journal of History Departement, Vol. 28, no. 1 (2019): 34-54.
Moniaga, Sandra. “Pengetahuan Masyarakat Dayak Sebagai Alternatif Dalam Penanganan Permasalahan Kerusakan Sumber Daya Alam Di Kalimantan: Suatu Kebutuhan Mendesak.” Kebudayaan Dayak: Aktualisasi Dan Transformasi, ed. Paulus Florus et al. Jakarta: Grasindo, 1994.
Pareira, Berthold Anton. “Dimanakah Allahmu? Teologi Mzm 42-43 Bagi Orang Di Zaman 4.0.” Siapakah Manusia; Siapakah Allah, ed. Valentinus, A. Denny Firmanto dan B.A. Pareira, 117-130. Malang: STFT WS Publication, 2019.
“Pembangunan Yang Membahagiakan.” Kompas, 20 Maret 2023.
Peraturan Pemerintah RI No. 28 Tahun 1985 tentang Perlindungan Hutan.
Https://peraturan.bpk.go.id/Home/Details/64604/pp-no-23-tahun-1985.
Peraturan Pemerintah RI No. 23 Tahun 2021 tentang Penyelenggaraan Hutan. https://peraturan.bpk.go.id/Home/Details/161853/pp-no-23-tahun-2021.
Peschke, Karl H. Christian Ethics: Moral Theology in the Light of Vatican II, Vol. II, 2nd ed. Bangalore: Theological Publications in India, 1992.
Pugu, Melyana R., Yanyan M. Yani dan Wahyu Wardana. “Pembangunan Infrastruktur Di Perbatasan Papua: Upaya Menjamin Human Security Dan Melawan Perdagangan Ilegal Lintas Batas.” Jurnal Masyarakat Indonesia: Majalah Ilmu-Ilmu Sosial Indonesia, Vol. 45, no. 1 (2019): 76-92.
“RI Kembali Protes Diskriminasi Uni Eropa.” Kompas, 26 Mei 2023.
Sinaga, Tatang Mulyana. “Baduy, Tenteram Dalam Dekapan Alam.” Kompas, 20 Maret 2023.
“Strategi Berbasis Lokalitas untuk Jawab Persoalan Masyarakat.” Kompas, 10 Juni 2023.
Sunarko, Adrianus. Teologi Kontekstual. Jakarta: Obor, 2016.
Suparno et.al. “Mempertahankan Eksistensi Budaya Lokal Nusantara Di Tengah Arus Globalisasi Melalui Pelestarian Tradisi Gawai Dayak Sintang.” Jurnal Pekan: Jurnal Pendidikan Kewarganegaraan, Vol. 3, no. 1 (April 2018): 43-56. http://dx.doi.org/10.31932/jpk.v3i1.144.
Surip, Stanislaus. Mengelola Dan Memelihara Taman Eden: Inspirasi Biblis Peduli Ekologis. Yogyakarta: Kanisius, 2019.
Tono, Suwidi. “Mitigasi Lumbung Pangan Baru.” Kompas, 6 Agustus 2020.
Triwibowo, Dionisius Reynaldo. “Siasat Terakhir Peladang Dayak Hadapi Gagal Panen.” Kompas, 24 September 2023.
Ukur, Fridolin. “Makna Religi Dari Alam Sekitar Dalam Kebudayaan Dayak.” Kebudayaan Dayak: Aktualisasi Dan Transformasi, ed. Paulus Florus et al. Jakarta: LP3S-Institute of Dayakology Reseach and Development, 1994.

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.