Apakah Milbank Keliru?: Tinjauan atas Polemik John Milbank dan Teolog Scotist Kontemporer Perihal Doktrin Univocity
Keywords:
doktrin univocity, John Duns Scotus, John Milbank, teolog Scotist kontemporer
Abstract
Artikel ini menganalisis doktrin univocity dalam polemik teologis antara John Milbank dan teolog-teolog Scotist kontemporer. Di dalamnya, penulis mengusung pernyataan tesis bahwa kekeliruan Milbank dalam memahami doktrin univocity secara paradoksal membuktikan validitas argumennya. Penulis mempertanggungjawabkan pernyataan tesisnya dengan memberikan penjelasan bercabang tiga. Masing-masing bagian berfokus pada argumen Milbank terhadap John Duns Scotus, kritik teolog-teolog Scotist kontemporer terhadap Milbank, dan alasan-alasan yang mengindikasikan sifat paradoksal dari argumen Milbank.
References
Cowdell, Scott. “Politics and Virtue: Radical Orthodoxy and Wisdom for the Common Good.” International Journal of Public Theology 12, no. 3–4 (November 5, 2018): 317–31. https://doi.org/10.1163/15697320-12341545.
Cross, Richard. “Duns Scotus and Suarez at the Origins of Modernity.” In Deconstructing Radical Orthodoxy: Postmodern Theology, Rhetoric, and Truth, edited by Wayne J. Hankey and Douglas Hedley, 65–80. Abingdon, Oxon: Routledge, 2016.
Cunningham, Conor. Genealogy of Nihilism: Philosophies of Nothing and the Difference of Theology. London: Routledge, 2002.
Horan, Daniel P. Postmodern and Univocity: A Critical Account of Radical Orthodoxy and John Duns Scotus. Minneapolis, MN: Augsburg Fortress, 2014.
John Duns Scotus. Philosophical Writings: A Selection. Translated by Allan Wolter. Indianapolis, IN: Hackett Publishing Company, 1987.
Kant, Immanuel. Critique of Pure Reason. Edited and translated by Paul Guyer and Allen W. Wood. New York: Cambridge University Press, 2000.
Meillassoux, Quentin. After Finitude: An Essay on the Necessity of Contingency. Translated by Ray Brassier. London: Continuum, 2011.
Milbank, John. Being Reconciled: Ontology and Pardon. London & New York: Routledge, 2003.
———. Beyond Secular Order: The Representation of Being and the Representation of the People. Chichester: John Wiley & Sons, 2013.
———. “Genealogies of Truth: Theology, Philosophy and History.” Modern Theology, November 2022.
https://doi.org/10.1111/moth.12830.
———. “Knowledge: The Theological Critique of Philosophy in Hamann and Jacobi.” In Radical Orthodoxy: A New Theology, edited by John Milbank, Graham Ward, and Catherine Pickstock, 21–37. London: Routledge, 1999.
———. Theology & Social Theory: Beyond Secular Reason. 2nd ed. Malden & Oxford: Blackwell Publishing, 2006.
Milbank, John, Simon Oliver, and Rupert Shortt, eds. “Radical Orthodoxy: A Conversation.” In The Radical Orthodoxy Reader, 28–48. Abingdon & New York: Routledge, 2009.
Milbank, John, Graham Ward, and Catherine Pickstock. “Suspending the Material: The Turn of Radical Orthodoxy.” In Radical Orthodoxy: A New Theology, edited by John Milbank, Graham Ward, and Catherine Pickstock, 1–20. London: Routledge, 1999.
Oliver, Simon. Philosophy, God and Motion. Abingdon, Oxon: Routledge, 2005.
Pachilla, Pablo N. “Resonances of the Voice of Being: Analogy and Univocity in Deleuze and Kant.” In Deleuze at the End of the World: Latin American Perspectives, edited by Dorothea E. Olkowski and Julian Ferreyra, 103–14. Lanham, MD: Rowman & Littlefield, 2020.
Pickstock, Catherine. “Duns Scotus: His Historical and Contemporary Significance.” Modern Theology 21, no. 4 (October 2005): 543–74. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-0025.2005.00297.x.
Prosman, Henk-Jan. “Radical Romanticism: Postmodern Polytheism in Richard Rorty and John Milbank.” International Journal of Philosophy and Theology 81, no. 1 (January 1, 2020): 18–35.
https://doi.org/10.1080/21692327.2018.1542610.
Rasmusson, Arne. “Radical Orthodoxy on Catholicism, Protestantism and Liberalism/Liberality: On the Use of Historical Narratives and Quantitative Methods in Political Theology.” Modern Theology 37, no. 1 (January 22, 2021): 44–61. https://doi.org/10.1111/moth.12596.
Somers-Hall, Henry. “Deleuze’s Philosophical Heritage: Unity, Difference, and Onto-Theology.” In The Cambridge Companion to Deleuze, edited by Daniel W. Smith and Henry Somers-Hall, 337–56. New York: Cambridge University Press, 2012.
Tonner, Philip. “Haecceitas and the Question of Being: Heidegger and Duns Scotus.” Kritike 2, no. 2 (2008): 146–54. https://eprints.gla.ac.uk/258695/1/258695.pdf.
———. Heidegger, Metaphysics, and the Univocity of Being. London: Continuum, 2010.
Williams, Thomas. “The Doctrine of Univocity Is True and Salutary.” Modern Theology 21, no. 4 (October 2005): 575–85. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-0025.2005.00298.x.
Wood, Benjamin James. “Montaigne and Christian Secularity: An Alternative to Radical Orthodoxy.” Radical Orthodoxy: Theology, Philosophy, Politics 3, no. 2 (2017): 128–71.
Zatwardnicki, Sławomir. “Radical Orthodoxy as Suspended Middle.” Wrocław Theological Review 27, no. 2 (2019): 121–47.
Cross, Richard. “Duns Scotus and Suarez at the Origins of Modernity.” In Deconstructing Radical Orthodoxy: Postmodern Theology, Rhetoric, and Truth, edited by Wayne J. Hankey and Douglas Hedley, 65–80. Abingdon, Oxon: Routledge, 2016.
Cunningham, Conor. Genealogy of Nihilism: Philosophies of Nothing and the Difference of Theology. London: Routledge, 2002.
Horan, Daniel P. Postmodern and Univocity: A Critical Account of Radical Orthodoxy and John Duns Scotus. Minneapolis, MN: Augsburg Fortress, 2014.
John Duns Scotus. Philosophical Writings: A Selection. Translated by Allan Wolter. Indianapolis, IN: Hackett Publishing Company, 1987.
Kant, Immanuel. Critique of Pure Reason. Edited and translated by Paul Guyer and Allen W. Wood. New York: Cambridge University Press, 2000.
Meillassoux, Quentin. After Finitude: An Essay on the Necessity of Contingency. Translated by Ray Brassier. London: Continuum, 2011.
Milbank, John. Being Reconciled: Ontology and Pardon. London & New York: Routledge, 2003.
———. Beyond Secular Order: The Representation of Being and the Representation of the People. Chichester: John Wiley & Sons, 2013.
———. “Genealogies of Truth: Theology, Philosophy and History.” Modern Theology, November 2022.
https://doi.org/10.1111/moth.12830.
———. “Knowledge: The Theological Critique of Philosophy in Hamann and Jacobi.” In Radical Orthodoxy: A New Theology, edited by John Milbank, Graham Ward, and Catherine Pickstock, 21–37. London: Routledge, 1999.
———. Theology & Social Theory: Beyond Secular Reason. 2nd ed. Malden & Oxford: Blackwell Publishing, 2006.
Milbank, John, Simon Oliver, and Rupert Shortt, eds. “Radical Orthodoxy: A Conversation.” In The Radical Orthodoxy Reader, 28–48. Abingdon & New York: Routledge, 2009.
Milbank, John, Graham Ward, and Catherine Pickstock. “Suspending the Material: The Turn of Radical Orthodoxy.” In Radical Orthodoxy: A New Theology, edited by John Milbank, Graham Ward, and Catherine Pickstock, 1–20. London: Routledge, 1999.
Oliver, Simon. Philosophy, God and Motion. Abingdon, Oxon: Routledge, 2005.
Pachilla, Pablo N. “Resonances of the Voice of Being: Analogy and Univocity in Deleuze and Kant.” In Deleuze at the End of the World: Latin American Perspectives, edited by Dorothea E. Olkowski and Julian Ferreyra, 103–14. Lanham, MD: Rowman & Littlefield, 2020.
Pickstock, Catherine. “Duns Scotus: His Historical and Contemporary Significance.” Modern Theology 21, no. 4 (October 2005): 543–74. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-0025.2005.00297.x.
Prosman, Henk-Jan. “Radical Romanticism: Postmodern Polytheism in Richard Rorty and John Milbank.” International Journal of Philosophy and Theology 81, no. 1 (January 1, 2020): 18–35.
https://doi.org/10.1080/21692327.2018.1542610.
Rasmusson, Arne. “Radical Orthodoxy on Catholicism, Protestantism and Liberalism/Liberality: On the Use of Historical Narratives and Quantitative Methods in Political Theology.” Modern Theology 37, no. 1 (January 22, 2021): 44–61. https://doi.org/10.1111/moth.12596.
Somers-Hall, Henry. “Deleuze’s Philosophical Heritage: Unity, Difference, and Onto-Theology.” In The Cambridge Companion to Deleuze, edited by Daniel W. Smith and Henry Somers-Hall, 337–56. New York: Cambridge University Press, 2012.
Tonner, Philip. “Haecceitas and the Question of Being: Heidegger and Duns Scotus.” Kritike 2, no. 2 (2008): 146–54. https://eprints.gla.ac.uk/258695/1/258695.pdf.
———. Heidegger, Metaphysics, and the Univocity of Being. London: Continuum, 2010.
Williams, Thomas. “The Doctrine of Univocity Is True and Salutary.” Modern Theology 21, no. 4 (October 2005): 575–85. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-0025.2005.00298.x.
Wood, Benjamin James. “Montaigne and Christian Secularity: An Alternative to Radical Orthodoxy.” Radical Orthodoxy: Theology, Philosophy, Politics 3, no. 2 (2017): 128–71.
Zatwardnicki, Sławomir. “Radical Orthodoxy as Suspended Middle.” Wrocław Theological Review 27, no. 2 (2019): 121–47.
