Konsep Etika Sosial dalam Pandangan Ketuhanan Jean-Luc Marion di Era Postmodern

Rudolfo Jacob Manusiwa; Irene Ludji; Izak Y. M. Lattu

doi:10.35312/spet.v23i2.524

Rudolfo Jacob Manusiwa Universitas Kristen Satya Wacana
Irene Ludji Universitas Kristen Satya Wacana https://orcid.org/0000-0001-5136-4072
Izak Y. M. Lattu Universitas Kristen Satya Wacana

DOI: https://doi.org/10.35312/spet.v23i2.524

Keywords: Jean-Luc Marion, Ethic, Postmodern, Divinity, Icon.

Abstract

This research delves explicitly into and elaborates on the concept of social ethics through the eyes of Jean-Luc Marion's concept of divinity. Through this research, the author understood the contribution of Marion's theory regarding the human face as an icon in social lives during the postmodern era. In order to get the results from the research, a qualitative approach to the literature study was used. The results show that Marion's ideas complete the concept of social ethics characteristics, which can formulate ethics. Marion offers to live icon relations and reject idol relations in social lives because icon relations are relevant for eliminating truth claims (God) within the framework of displaying the character of religious adherents that are inclusive, hospitable, and constructive actions appreciative of each of the characteristics of the various definitions and concepts of divinity. Icon relations live the values of inclusiveness, accepting and being open to plural truth (definition and concept of God), and viewing truth as relative. Furthermore, Marion's understanding of human relations with humans speaks phenomenologically and is normative. Human relations refer to individual awareness that the responses in living together are ethical orders that speak through faces (icon), and the context of agape is also present. Ethical orders and agape will always burden the individual when every time he is faced with the face (icon) of another being.

References

Ajibola, Ilesanmi. “A Hermeneutical Application of the Iconic Gaze in Jean-Luc Marion’s Postmodern Phenomenology to Galatian 3:28 A Template for an Expression of Christian Love.” International Journal of Philosophy and Theology (IJPT) 2, no. 4 (2014). https://doi.org/10.15640/ijpt.v2n4a8.
Armstrong, Karen. Berperang Demi Tuhan: Fundamentalisme Dalam Islam, Kristen Dan Yahudi, Terj. T. Hermaya, Mizan, Bandung, 2013.
Bertens, Kees. Etika K. Bertens. Vol. 21. Gramedia Pustaka Utama, 1993.
Compaan, Auke. “The Revelation of Christ as an Impossible Impossibility: A Critical Reading of Jean-Luc Marion’s Contribution to the Post-Modern Debate in Phenomenology, Philosophy of Religion and Theology.” STJ | Stellenbosch Theological Journal 1, no. 1 (2015). https://doi.org/10.17570/stj.2015.v1n1.a3.
Devos, Hannes. “Pengantar Etika,” 1987.
Grenz, Stanley J. A Primer on Postmodernism. Wm. B. Eerdmans Publishing, 1996.
Horner, R. Jean-Luc Marion: A Theo-Logical Introduction. To B and E. Ashgate, 2005. https://books.google.co.id/books?id=v%5C_UHM-Gizr8C.
Horner, Robyn. Jean-Luc Marion: A Theo-Logical Introduction. Jean-Luc Marion: A Theo-Logical Introduction, 2013. https://doi.org/10.5860/choice.43-2143.
Husserl, Edmund, William P Alston, and George Nakhnikian. “The Idea of Phenomenology.” Les Etudes Philosophiques 20, no. 4 (1964).
Kant, Immanuel. Critique of Pure Reason. The Cambridge Edition of the Works of Immanuel Kant. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1998. https://doi.org/DOI: 10.1017/CBO9780511804649.
Kimball, Charles (Authors) Munir dan Ahmad Baiquni (Translator). Kala Agama Jadi Bencana. Cet. 1. Jakarta: Mizan Pustaka, 2013.
Kristianto, Paulus Eko. “Fenomena Melimpah Menurut Jean-Luc Marion.” Dekonstruksi 2, no. 01 (2021): 120–135. https://jurnaldekonstruksi.id/index.php/dekonstruksi/article/view/41.
Lyotard, Jean-Francois, Geoff Bennington, and Brian Massumi. “The Postmodern Condition: A Report on Knowledge.” Poetics Today 5, no. 4 (1984). https://doi.org/10.2307/1772278.
Marion, Jean-Luc. Being Given: Toward a Phenomenology of Givenness. Stanford University Press, 2002.
———. In Excess: Studies of Saturated Phenomena. Fordham University Press, 2002.
———. The Idol and Distance: Five Studies. Fordham University Press, 2001.
Marion, Jean-Luc, and David Tracy. God Without Being: Hors-Texte, Second Edition. University of Chicago Press, 2012.
Moran, Dermot. Introduction to Phenomenology. Introduction to Phenomenology, 2002. https://doi.org/10.4324/9780203196632.
Muri, Yusuf. Metode Penelitian Kuantitatif, Kualitatif, Dan Peneltian Gabungan. Kencana, 2017.
Muzairi, Muzairi. “Diskursus Mengenai Tuhan Di Dalam Dan Di Luar Metafisika (God Is Being and God Without Being).” Refleksi: Jurnal Filsafat Dan Pemikiran Islam 17, no. 1 (2017).
Schwartz, Regina M. Transcendence: Philosophy, Literature, and Theology Approach the Beyond. Routledge, 2004.
Sugiharto, Ign. Postmodernisme: Tantangan Bagi Filsafat. Yayasan Kanisius, 2014.
Sugiharto, Ign, and Agustinus Rachmat Widianto. Wajah Baru Etika Dan Agama. Yayasan Kanisius, 2000.
Tandyanto, Yulius. “Jean-Luc Marion: Pengantar Atas ‘Keterberian’ Dan ‘Fenomen Yang Melimpah.’” MELINTAS 30, no. 2 (2014). https://doi.org/10.26593/mel.v30i2.1288.169-191.
Tedjoworo, Hadrianus. “Kontribusi Fenomenologi Post-Subjek Pada Metodologi Filosofis Dan Teologis.” MELINTAS 34, no. 1 (2018). https://doi.org/10.26593/mel.v34i1.3085.60-79.
Titaley, John A. Religiositas Di Alinea Tiga: Pluralisme, Nasionalisme Dan Transformasi Agama-Agama. Satya Wacana University Press, 2013.
Wibisono, Haryo Kunto, Linda Novi Trianita, and Sri Widagdo. “Dimension of Pancasila Ethics in Bureaucracy: Discouse of Governance.” In Filsafat, Etika, Dan Kearifan Lokal Untuk Konstruksi Moral Kebangsaan, 2013.
Wibowo, A Setyo. “Kronologi Jalan Hidup Heidegger.” BASIS, 2018.
Wibowo, Setyo Agustinus. “Ikonoklasme Atau Idoloklasme?” BASIS 67 (01-02), 2018.