Visi Eskatologis-Kreatif dan Eksemplaris-Terbuka sebagai Model Kehadiran Kristen dalam Konteks Indonesia

  • Christanto Sema Rappan Paledung
Keywords: Berdyaev, eschatological-creative, exemplarity-openness, Hardjowasito

Abstract

This paper intends to look for a vision of Christian presence that might be applied in the context of a pluralistic society, such as Indonesia. Therefore, I ventured into the tradition of the 20th century Russian Orthodox Church to look for that possibility. It was Nikolai Berdyaev, a Russian theologian who redefined the direction of church in Russia in his day. He expressed a philosophy of creative freedom in the eschatological perspective of the Orthodox Church. He stressed the importance of human participation in the divine work to resist objectification of the world. I will construct the vision of Christian Berdyaev’s presence, I will look at the thoughts of a theologian of a Calvinist Church in Indonesia, namely, namely Kadarmanto Hardjowasito. He expressed his Christian vision which emphasized exemplarity and openness to other individuals and communities as visions of Christian presence. Both thoughts can build a theological construction for visions of Christian presence in the Indonesian context

References

Alfeyev, Bishop Hilarion. “Eschatology.” The Cambridge Companion to Orthodox
Christian theology. Disunting oleh Mary Cunningham dan
Elizabeth Theokritoff, (2008), 107–120.
Berdyaev, Nikolai. “Salvation and creativity.” Www.berdyaev.com,
(1926). http://www.berdyaev.com/berdiaev/berd_lib/1926_308.html.
———. The Destiny of Man. Diterjemahkan oleh Natalie Duddington. New
York: Harper Torchbooks, 1955.
———. The Meaning of The Creative Act. Diterjemahkan oleh Donald A
Lowrie, 1962.
Berger, Peter L. The sacred canopy: elements of a sociological theory of religion.
New York: Anchor Books, 1990.
Hardjowasito, Kadarmanto. Belajar Merayakan Kemajemukan: Pendidikan
61 Moyaert, Fragile Identities, 228.
36 Studia Philosophica et Theologica, Vol. 19 No. 1, April 2019
Religius Kristiani dalam Masyarakat Multikultur. Orasi Dies Natalis
ke-71 STT Jakarta. Unit Penerbitan dan Informasi STT Jakarta, 2005.
———. “Pendidikan Agama Kristen (PAK) dalam Konteks Masyarakat
Indonesia yang Majemuk.” Berakar di dalam Dia dan dibangun di atas
Dia. Disunting oleh Robert P. Borrong. Jakarta: BPK Gunung Mulia,
1998, 107–23.
———. “The Significance of David Tracy’s and George Lindbeck’s Theological
Methods for a Religious Education That Takes Dialogue
among Religious Groups Seriously.” Presbyterian School of Christian
Education Richmond, 1991.
Hughes, Richard A. “Nikolai Berdyaev’s Theology Creativity.” International
Journal of Orthodox Theology 7:2 (2016): 119–141.
Kaufman, Gordon D. Systematic Theology: A Historicist Perspective. Charles
Scribner’s Sons, 1968.
Kearney, Richard. The God Who May Be: a Hermeneutics of Religion. Indiana
series in the philosophy of religion. Bloomington: Indiana University
Press, 2001.
Kiseleva, Marina S. “Understanding History: The Decisions of Nikolai
Berdyaev.” Russian Studies in Philosophy 53, no. 4 (2 Oktober 2015):
305–323. https://doi.org/10.1080/10611967.2015.1123058.
Klein, Paul. Kebebasan Kreatif Menurut Nikolai Berdyaev: Terang
Pengharapan dalam Dunia yang Gelap. Maumere: Penerbit Ledalero,
2008.
McKinlay, Brian. “Revelation in Nicolas Berdyaev’s Religious Philosophy.”
Open Theology 3, no. 1 (26 Januari 2017).
Moyaert, Marianne. Fragile Identities: Towards a Theology of Interreligious
Hospitality. Amsterdam: Rodopi, 2011.
Nicolaus, Georg. Individuation and the Person: A Critical Comparison. Taylor
& Francis Group, 2010.
Schmemann, Alexander. Introduction to Liturgical Theology. Crestwood,
N.Y: St. Vladimir’s Seminary Press, 2003.
Published
2019-12-11
Section
Articles